Monday 24 February 2014

live | it's pho real

A few weekend's ago Emily and I took a day trip to Westfield for a break from work and a spot of retail therapy! We took some shots of sights that sparked inspiration and we wanted to share them with you.





Emily and I getting a little bit happy snappy in the train...




This was an amazing photography/art shop exhibiting all kinds and types of fabulous, stirring art. We put some pieces on our list of future house decorations! There was a huge picture of a family of elephants in monochrome - we loved it!


Philosophy is an amazing skincare brand. At the Boots in Westfield we explored the Philosophy counter and tried the Grace line of  fragrances. There are three versions of the perfume in the line, which all derive from the original 'Amazing Grace' - we LOVE the 'Living Grace' perfume. Fresh, lively, invigorating, joyful - all that good stuff. It's commercialised as a fragrance that will lift the soul and encourage living in the present. Here is Philosophy's website so you can delve into the skincare range at your own leisure!
http://www.philosophyskincare.co.uk/




 

 We had a bite to eat at EAT and enjoyed a new meal. It's called Pho, pronounced 'fuh' I believe. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong! Oh my gosh. This thing. It's basically a Vietnamese noodle soup and comprises of a broth, noodles, herbs and often meat. They had a range of Pho to choose from. Em opted for it with chicken and I had Chinese dumplings containing mushroom and tofu. So. Good. Definitely check it out next time you need lunch/hungry.





Enjoy today!!

- rosinaviolets   x

Thursday 13 February 2014

live | what is creation?

So, the other day I went to a lecture at Uni on the nature of creation.  The lecturer was arguing that creation is a theological act.  We can 'create' art, buildings, even GM crops, but this is never a true act of creation.  At best, it's an act of manipulation of an existing thing into something else.  Pure creation can only happen from the hands of God.

Now, I hear some of you out there scoffing at your computer screens.  I didn't agree with him immediately either.  But hear me out.  If you think about everything around you, and go back to the constituent parts, where do you get?  I'm sitting at a wooden desk, which was made out of a tree, which was grown in the ground, but who started the whole process off in the beginning?  What made the tree?  What made the seed? What made the earth?  Who started the Big Bang? 


The problem is that in the beginning, something had to come from nothing.  How is that possible?  For me, I argue that some kind of universal force, something I call 'love' (in the greatest sense of that word), positively had to intend to create.  If you believe in God, call it God.

The force of creation is inside us, and inside everything.


Where I differ from the lecturer is that I disagree that we, as 'creatures' are separate to the 'creator'.  In Christian theology, God is the creator, and we are totally separate from him.  The world around us is all God's creation, but none of it is God.  We are not God.  It might sound odd that I disagree.  But I believe that the force of love, the force of creation, is inside us, and inside everything.  If we accept a creator created us, and that before it did so there was nothing, surely we must be made up of the creator?  What else would it have to create with?  The lecturer argued that God created something different from himself, out of nothing.  I find this concept impossible to grasp.

If, as I argue, there is a part of the universal force of creation, of love, inside us all, we can all strive to discover it, and become unified with it, and find our purpose for existing on this planet.  At this point, the lecturer brought in a new and rather long word into the story: 'eschatology'.  Eschatology is basically the point of creation.  What's the point of creation?  I believe we are all on this planet to find out what our 'purpose' is.  What we truly love to do.  What makes us zing.  We've got to find a way to do what we love to do to serve humanity in some way, shape or form.  If you love painting, go out there and get painting and give the back to the world the beauty you see in it.  Whatever you love to do, do it, and when you do, the unbridled force of creative love inside you will be unlocked.

Get that flow.


Have you ever experienced that feeling when you are totally focused on one thing, and wholly absorbed by it, and time seems to evaporate and fly past all at the same time? And your body is just goosepimpled all over because of the sheer joy you're having?  That feeling, is the universal force I'm talking about it.  That is creation.

I don't think there's something external to us that's responsible for creating the world.  I think the responsible something, if you believe in God, then God, is at once other from us, in that it existed logically prior to us, but within us.  That thing was there before we were, but it makes up a fundamental part of our existence.  Creation is not something we have to be separate from.  When we create what we do, using the things created in the beginning by the force of love, we are honouring that force and bringing more of it into our lives.  When you get into that flow, that zinging, tingly, wonderful feeling, you're aligning with the magnificent force of pure creation, and that force is inside you.  That's the goal.  Get on the level of that force inside you.  How you get there is totally individual to you.  But you know you're there when you're there.

Get creating my lovelies.  Get zinging.  That's what I want for you all, for today, and for the rest of your life!

Enjoy today!!

- rosinaviolets    x

Sunday 9 February 2014

wear | OOTD | using those ankle boots... again!

So... here's us, on a recent trip to Westfield, really loving those ankle boots... again!

Sarah
Coat: Zara, Jumper: H&M, Jeans: Topshop, Ankle Boots: River Island,
Bag: Topshop.





Emily

Coat: Topshop, Jumper: Zara, White long-sleeved top: Primark, Skirt: H&M,
Super warm tights: Primark, Ankle Boots: H&M, Bag: Next.





Enjoy today!!

- rosinaviolets    x

make | GHANA | Rae's sweet bread




Hello Februrary! This month we exploring Ghana! Emily's friend Rachel's family are Ghanaian, and the food she talks about always sounds delicious and very exciting! Last week, she very generously treated us to a loaf of sweet bread, which she bought from a bakers in Tottenham.  It was thoroughly enjoyed by the whole family - it's a little bit like hot cross bun bread, but without the raisins.  We enjoyed it toasted, with lots of honey, or in Sarah's case a good dollop of the (totally un-Ghanaian!) gooseberry jam!

Ghanaian food is really diverse, but is generally based around a carbohydrate rich staple food, like plantain, yam or beans, which is served alongside a stew.  Alternatively, you might have a piece of fish, or chicken with a spicy sauce.  Rachel always uses Scotch Bonnet chilli peppers, which are, word of warning to those of you who are heat-sensitive, really HOT.  So, if you can't hack the heat, go for something Ghanaian inspired, and substitute with a green chilli or two instead!

We got ourselves in a creative mood and used our own knowledge of bread recipes, (and the ingredients label on the package) to come up with our own recipe for sweet bread.  Why not have a go and make some for a teatime treat! Yum!

Enjoy today!!

- rosinaviolets    x





Ghanaian Sweet Bread (inspired by Uncle John's Original Sweet Bread from Rachel's Bakery in Tottenham!)

220g strong white bread flour (if you want to go slightly healthier, you can use half white, half wholemeal)
2 x 7g sachets yeast
2 dessert spoons white sugar
pinch of salt
pinch of ground nutmeg
1 teaspoon oil or margarine
water

900g / 2lb / 23 x 13 x 7 cm loaf tin


  • In a bowl, mix together all the dry ingredients.  Make a well in the centre and at the teaspoon of oil or margarine.  Rub it into the dry ingredients.  

  • Little by little add water until you get an elastic dough.  If you add too much water and the dough gets too sticky, add a little more flour until you get back to the right consistency.  

  • Knead your dough.  Get right in there! Really stretch it up to get that gluten all stretched out.  

  • Arrange your dough into a loaf shape.  Take a knife and cut a slit down the middle of the dough, not too deep.  Grease the loaf tin lightly with some oil or margarine.  Place your loaf in the tin.  

  • Get a nice clean tea towel and make it a little damp with some warm water.  Lay it over the top of the tin and leave the whole thing somewhere warm to prove for about 45 minutes, until it doubles in size.  

  • Preheat your oven to 200C.  

  • Place your loaf in the oven to bake for between 30 - 40 minutes.  Keep an eye on it - you don't want it to get too brown.  When it looks done, turn it out of the tin, turn it upside down and tap on the base.  If it sounds hollow, it's done.  Allow to cool before slicing and eating.  Enjoy! 

Sunday 2 February 2014

read | January | Try me... Test me... Taste me... Joanne Harris' 'Chocolat'

January's almost over!  We have been reading (actually, we are mid-way through reading!) Joanne Harris' wonderful novel 'Chocolat'.  It's an uplifting and magical journey investigating the conflict between religion and desire, in all it's manifestations.

Fancy one?
From the blurb... 
When an exotic stranger, Vianne Rocher, arrives in the French village of Lansquenet and opens a chocolate boutique directly opposite the church, Father Reynaud identifies her as a serious danger to his flock - especially as it is the beginning of Lent, the traditional season of self-denial.  War is declared as the priest denounces the newcomer's wares as the ultimate sin.  

Suddenly, Vianne's shop-come-cafe means that there is somewhere for secrets to be whispered, grievances to be aired, dreams to be tested.  But Vianne's plans for an Easter Chocolate Festival divide the whole community in a conflict that escalates into a 'Church not Chocolate' battle.  As mouths water in anticipation, can the solemnity of the Church compare with the pagan passion of a chocolate eclair? 


Emily
Harris writes with incredible detail and appeals to all the senses.  The characters are totally believable and present a plethora of beliefs and views.  The beautiful writing makes the book a joy to read, but she also deals with some really interesting themes, looking at how religions are not so different after all, how people interact with each other and how communities work, as well as the importance of pleasure in our lives.

Never have I read a book in which you can learn to feel so accepting of your own desires, which I think is so important for your own self-acceptance and happiness.  Self-denial is looked upon with pity, and this is a viewpoint that I think needs voicing in modern society.  So much of the media is focused on critiquing ourselves - we need to wear more make-up, change our hair, lose weight.  Self-denial is seen as a virtue that we aspire towards.  Harris presents it for the vice that it is.  In order to be healthy and happy we must acknowledge our desires, and learn to listen to our heart, mind and body as a whole.  So, you want a chocolate from one of the boxes left over from Christmas? - go ahead! Listen to your body.  It will tell you to stop when it needs to.  Harris encourages us to trust ourselves - this is the only way to live a life of ease and happiness.

Sarah
'Chocolat' is such a compelling, unique novel and I am so glad we took a dip into the book this month. It really uplifts while encourages reflection on social issues such as religion and relationships. Harris explores views on the debate that centres around self-denial vs. self-gratification, and presents the main character Vianne Rocher as the promoter of self-indulgence in a constrained French village. The main point is that although we may try to restrict ourselves of pleasure, we do inevitably need it in our lives in order for ourselves to be happy and calm. Behind all this, in addition, Harris portrays Vianne's difficult life and highlights the importance and comfort of having a home and friendships. 

Monsieur Reynaud, the Church pastor, is full of complexities, many of which only revealed as the novel develops. This, I think, is one of the reasons why the novel is so interesting. As Reynaud's state of mind degrades as he falls deeper into despair, we learn from Vianne Rocher, who remains ever in a happy state of mind despite her harsher predicament. Overall, Harris encourages succumbing to your desires and loves. After all, why deprive yourself of what you love if it's going to make you feel bad?